EUROPEAN FAs SOUND ALARM OVER "ASTRONOMICAL" WC 2026 COSTS
New reports show FAs are worried about high US travel costs and tax complexities. Could this affect team basecamp choices?
FINANCE
KICKOFF USA 2026
2/28/20262 min read


LONDON/PARIS — A new financial shadow is looming over the 2026 World Cup as several powerful European football associations express deep concern about the staggering cost of operating in the United States.
While the tournament promises record revenue, internal reports from UEFA member nations suggest that the expense of travel, accommodation, and navigating a complex U.S. tax code could result in significant financial losses for participating teams.
The Logistics Nightmare
Unlike previous compact tournaments, the 2026 edition spans an entire continent. For European teams, this logistics puzzle translates into astronomical costs:
Internal Travel: A team drawn to play matches in Vancouver, New York, and Miami faces over 6,000 miles of internal travel, requiring multiple chartered wide-body jets for players, staff, and equipment.
Accommodation Spikes: Hotel rates in key "hub" cities like Dallas and Los Angeles have already quadrupled for the tournament period. One FA official, speaking anonymously, labeled the quotes they received as "simply exploitative."
The IRS Complexity
Compounding the expense is the intricate United States tax system. European FAs are legally structured as non-profits in their home countries, but operating and earning revenue (via merchandise, local sponsorships, or performance bonuses) within the U.S. triggers complex federal and state tax requirements.
FA legal teams are now scrambling to understand withholding requirements for player bonuses and corporate tax obligations for association activities on American soil, adding a significant administrative and financial burden.
Basecamp Strategy Shift
These financial anxieties are directly impacting team basecamp selections.
Avoiding the Hubs: Many European nations are abandoning plans to base themselves in high-cost tier-1 cities. Instead, they are scouting locations in smaller, more affordable markets (e.g., Salt Lake City, Charlotte, or even San Antonio) and planning to fly into match venues only 48 hours prior to kickoff.
Canada/Mexico Preference: Associations with tighter budgets are reportedly prioritizing basecamps in Canada and Mexico, where operating costs are lower, and the tax landscape is perceived as less volatile for foreign sports entities.
"Winning the World Cup is the ultimate sporting goal, but we must also ensure the long-term financial health of our association," noted one European FA CEO. "At this rate, simply participating could bankrupt a smaller nation."

